En realidad, se puede discutir si el proceso "transformativo" existe o en qué nivel del proceso expresivo interviene, sobre la base de que se pueda plantear si nos topamos con las palabras al hablar o, más bien, partimos de ellas. Aunque yo me inclino por lo primero, y abogaría por procesos paralelos predicactanciales, analíticos y sintéticos, intentamos darnos cuenta de ese proceso de neologización en el que el 'sentido de la palabra', dinámicamente tal, está sucesivamente inmerso, sin solución de continuidad entre sincroníaa and sincroníab, dado que “every language is the product of change and continues to change as long as it is spoken”, según Langacker hace ver (1967:179).

SUMMARY
It is debatable whether the transformational process exists or at what level of the process of speaking intervenes, whether we simply come across words as we speak or, rather, use them as starting point. Although I feel inclined to believe the former, and would argue that there are parallel predicactantial processes, both analytical and synthetic, we still try to become aware of the process of production of new words in which the meaning of a word, in a dynamic sense, is successively immersed, within a continuum, between a synchronya and synchronyb, since “every language is the product of change and continues to change as long as it is spoken”, as Langacker (1967:179) says.